Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Art changes art.
Yet in taking on the Renaissance, Rodin changes art itself.
But the contrasting ways that things plucked from the real world are used reveal an interesting progression of sensibilities and emphasize the profound changes art underwent around 1960.
Art doesn't change the world, and the world changes art only in ways that, whatever else they may be, are consistent with unforced pleasure.
No one changes art the way Cage changed art without an enormous ego, and Cage's commanding one could be felt in just about everything he ever wrote or did.
Similar(55)
It became art, and so changed art forever.
Lichtenstein changed art to some extent, but nothing else.
Impressionism was a revolution that changed art forever.
Warhol not only radically changed art, but he changed America too.
The idea was that we had to change taste in order to change art.
Certainly it hadn't changed art, at least not in a permanent way.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com