changed following

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "changed following" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to indicate something that has been altered as a result of subsequent events or actions, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The policy was changed following the recent review of its effectiveness."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Things have changed, following the hurricane, the ensuing gentrification, and the eponymous television show.

The Guardian - Travel

Thoronka's fortunes changed following the media publicity, but things have not always been plain sailing.

The Guardian

A popular truism is that "the world changed" following 9/11.

The Guardian - Opinion

That all changed following my success as a Youth in the British Senior Championships.

The Guardian - Sport

My perceptions concerning certain law enforcement practices changed following that incident.

The New York Times

Michael Fenton's fortunes look to have changed following a recent catastrophic Ascot.

The Guardian - Sport

When the series starts again, the order has changed, following the score, and Mendioroz joins in.

The New Yorker

That all changed following Katie's comments, which pointedly linked the Pakistan flag to paedophilia.

Independent

In the nineteen-eighties, that changed, following economic reforms that allowed some people to take ownership of the land.

The New Yorker

Things changed following 'Days of Wine and Roses.' That was as important a film as I've ever done".

The New York Times

Its name was changed following the end of participation by several newly communist countries of Southeast Asia.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity and grammatical correctness, consider replacing "changed following" with alternatives like "changed after", "modified as a result of", or "altered due to". This will enhance the precision and professionalism of your writing.

Common error

While "changed following" is frequently used, it can sound awkward or imprecise in formal contexts. Opt for more grammatically sound and stylistically polished alternatives to ensure your writing maintains a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "changed following" typically functions as part of a verb phrase, indicating that an action or state was altered as a consequence of a subsequent event. It often appears in descriptive contexts, as shown by the examples analyzed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "changed following" is frequently encountered across various domains like science, news, and general writing, it is considered grammatically weak and not the most precise way to express the intended meaning. As Ludwig AI points out, opting for alternatives such as "changed after", "modified as a result of", or "altered due to" can enhance clarity and grammatical correctness, particularly in formal contexts. Although commonly used, there exist many clearer alternatives, which are preferred in authoritative contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

changed after

Emphasizes the temporal sequence, indicating the change occurred at some point after the specified event.

modified as a result of

Highlights the cause-and-effect relationship, showing the change was a direct consequence.

altered due to

Similar to 'as a result of', but can also imply that the change was influenced or necessitated by the event.

adjusted subsequent to

More formal and emphasizes the timing of the adjustment in relation to the event.

transformed following

Suggests a more significant or fundamental change occurred after the event.

adapted in response to

Implies a reaction to a specific stimulus or situation, resulting in a change.

revised because of

Indicates that the change was made to correct or improve something based on new information or circumstances.

different now after

Simply states that it's different without indicating any causality.

became changed after

A more verbose way of saying "changed after", highlighting the transformation.

was changed by

Indicates that something was directly acted upon and altered by a specific agent or event.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "changed following"?

Consider alternatives such as "changed after", "modified as a result of", or "altered due to" for clearer and more grammatically sound phrasing.

Is "changed following" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, "changed following" is considered grammatically weak and can be improved by using more precise alternatives. Ludwig AI suggests that, while the structure appears very often, it could be better.

How can I use "changed following" in a sentence effectively?

Although common, strive for clarity by rephrasing sentences using stronger alternatives to "changed following". For example, instead of "The rules changed following the review", say "The rules were changed after the review".

What is the difference between "changed following" and "changed after"?

Both indicate a sequence of events, but "changed after" is generally more direct and grammatically preferred. "Changed following" can sound less polished in formal writing. Ludwig's analysis suggests opting for more direct constructions.