chances on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "chances on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it is intended to be used, as it does not form a standard expression. Example: "I don't think we should take chances on this decision."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Flailing with three chances on one possession, they whiffed on every one.

The New York Times - Sports

"He takes chances on guys".

The New York Times - Sports

Others take their chances on the border.

The New York Times

Many took their chances on the street.

The New Yorker

Everyone takes chances on that result.

The New York Times

I would take my chances on life".

The New York Times - Science

I'll take my chances on that".

The New York Times - Sports

The Orioles ran out of last chances on Friday.

The New York Times - Sports

Still, students were not taking their chances on Friday.

The New York Times

Captain Red has been taking few chances on the highway.

The New York Times - Travel

"Yeah, I ruined my chances on 'X Factor'.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "chances on" is frequently found, consider replacing it with more grammatically accepted phrases like "opportunities for", "chances for", or "risks involving" to enhance clarity and credibility in your writing. Be mindful of your audience and the level of formality required.

Common error

Avoid using "chances on" when "chances for", "opportunities for", or "risks involving" would be more appropriate. Ensure the preposition correctly reflects the relationship between the noun and the object; "on" often implies a surface or condition, which may not be the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "chances on" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb. Although commonly used, Ludwig AI marks this as incorrect. Therefore, its function is often grammatically dubious, serving to indicate possibilities, opportunities, or risks related to something else.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "chances on" appears frequently in diverse sources, including news and media, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Its purpose generally involves indicating opportunities, risks, or probabilities. Given the grammatical concerns and available alternatives like "opportunities for", it is advisable to opt for more precise and grammatically sound phrases, especially in formal writing. Though "chances on" is common, particularly in news contexts, adhering to standard grammatical conventions enhances clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

opportunities for

This alternative replaces "chances" with "opportunities" and the preposition "on" with "for" to create a more grammatically sound and widely accepted phrase.

possibilities with

This highlights the potential or likelihood of something happening or being true in connection to something else.

prospects for

This suggests a forward-looking view of potential success or advancement related to a subject.

likelihood of

This alternative emphasizes the probability or chance of a certain event or outcome occurring.

risks involving

This alternative focuses on the potential negative outcomes or hazards associated with a situation.

odds concerning

This alternative represents the probability or likelihood of a particular outcome in relation to something else.

bets regarding

This alternative implies a gamble or speculation related to a specific topic or event.

options within

This focuses on the available choices or alternatives in a specific situation or context.

dependence on

This alternative shifts the focus to reliance or reliance on a factor, rather than opportunities.

reliance upon

Similar to dependence on, this phrase highlights the act of depending on something for support or success.

FAQs

Is "chances on" grammatically correct?

While commonly found, Ludwig AI considers "chances on" grammatically incorrect. Consider using phrases like "opportunities for", "chances for", or "risks involving" for better grammatical accuracy.

What are some alternatives to "chances on"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "opportunities for", "likelihood of", or "prospects for" instead of "chances on".

When is it appropriate to use "chances on"?

While "chances on" appears in various sources, it's advisable to use more grammatically sound alternatives, particularly in formal writing. Consider the context and choose a phrase that accurately conveys your intended meaning with correct preposition usage.

What's the difference between "chances on" and "opportunities for"?

"Chances on" is often considered grammatically incorrect or less precise, while "opportunities for" is a grammatically correct and clearer way to express the availability of favorable circumstances or possibilities. Using "opportunities for" enhances the clarity and formality of your writing.