Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
In both time windows, all participants performed better than chance, ranging between 54 and 83% (Fig. 5 a, b).
18 We used the I statistic to estimate the percentage of total variation across studies due to heterogeneity rather than chance (ranging from 0% to 100%).
Heterogeneity was calculated by the I2 test, which shows the rate of variation across studies due to heterogeneity rather than to chance (ranging from 0 (no heterogeneity) to 100 (maximum heterogeneity)) [ 13].
Similar(57)
There was a varied amount of agreement on the quality of evidence for the outcomes relating to each of the twelve questions (kappa coefficients for agreement beyond chance ranged from 0 to 0.82).
Furthermore, the gene diversity [ 45] for each library, which represents the probability of drawing two distinct sequences from a library by chance, ranged from 0.970 to 0.994, indicating that the libraries contained many unique sequences (Table 2).
When this criterion was applied to all possible inter-donor comparisons within a condition it was determined that the number of differences expected by random chance ranged from 2 (3-day P0) to 77 (16-day P5).
That's a low figure, but higher than that of the other three No. 15 seeds, whose chances ranged between 1.1 percent (Albany) and 2.6 percent (Pacific).
In major cities in North America, your chances range between three to nine percent depending in large part on the quality of the emergency response system.
That decision read: "Games of chance range from those that require no skill, such as a lottery…to those such as poker, blackjack which require considerable skill in calculating the probability of drawing particular cards.
Six more miles and we reached the edge of the playa, a dry lake bed, wedged between the Cottonwood and Last Chance ranges.
Overall agreement was better than could be expected on the basis of chance and ranged from 32%to5757% depending on agreement criteria and complexity of the diagnostic categorization analyzed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com