Sentence examples for chance discrimination from inspiring English sources

Derived from data in (Bushdid et al., 2014 ) as for Figure 2. (B ): The thick red line shows the critical distance d that would result from the data in (Bushdid et al., 2014 ) for a range of 'fraction discriminated' thresholds between 100% (perfect discrimination), and 33.3% (chance discrimination).

An area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.0 represents perfect discrimination, whereas an AUC of 0.5 represents chance discrimination.

c-statistics range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect discrimination and 0.5 indicating a chance discrimination; a c-statistic between 0.7 and 0.8 is considered a good discrimination, and a c-statistic >0.8 an excellent discrimination.

In other words, determine for which subjects (or alternatively, for which classes of mixtures) the fraction discriminated is significantly greater than 1 3, i.e., for which subjects the null hypothesis of chance discrimination can be rejected.

Even when the stimulus types in the present study differed only in the arrangement of their fragments, with low-level stimulus information remaining similar, a difference in processing of the different stimulus types is demonstrated by participants' over-chance discrimination performance between fragmented and scrambled line drawings.

The (correct) above-chance discrimination of certain visual features, in the absence of any conscious awareness, has also been termed 'blindsight type 1', whereas in the 'softer variant' of 'blindsight type 2', the patient has a vague feeling that something has occurred (Weiskrantz, 1996).

The area under an ROC curve, and hence the R-index, ranges from 0.5 (chance level discrimination) to 1 (perfect discrimination) and measures an individual's ability to discriminate between two stimuli, in this case the presence or absence of a tactile stimulus.

What if a new set of KPIs allowed for partners to be promoted and demoted based on new factors that offered less chance for discrimination?

The study showed that chance of discrimination of items in old people with different QL can be considered high because in case QL higher than 1.70 (Baker, 2001), this number indicates high quality discrimation in terms of quality of life.

So even if you do put in the effort, there's every chance that discrimination will still rear its ugly head, preventing you from testing your mettle against male counterparts.

They demonstrated that above chance utrocular discrimination for low spatial frequency gratings could be abolished by adding a luminance change to the other eye containing only a uniform grey.