challenging to contest

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "challenging to contest" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a situation or argument that is difficult to dispute or challenge. Example: "The evidence presented was so compelling that it was challenging to contest the findings of the research."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Reference

Social Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

On 9 September, the Sierra Club, the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Friends of Blair Mountain and the West Virginia Labor History Association filed a legal challenge to contest the site's removal from the National Register.

The Guardian - Opinion

In those intervening weeks before the electoral college vote, Trump could mount a legal challenge to contest the result or demand a recount under certain circumstances but unless the vote margin is slim his chances of his case being successful are low.

The Guardian

On the October 22 episode of Impact!, Hardy challenged Jarrett to contest their bout under Ladder match rules, which Jarrett accepted.

Wikipedia

Vitali Klitschko, the WBC champion, and the man Haye challenged to a contest minutes after he had twice left Chisora splayed on the canvas here, cannot fail to have taken notice of how the 31-year-old performed a little over a year since Haye was beaten by the Ukrainian's younger brother, Wladimir, on an equally rain-soaked night in Hamburg.

The Guardian - Sport

And it will need to be, to combat the challenges ahead – to contest the "lifters and leaners" paradigm, to continue to challenge the negative and limiting view of disability, to ensure that the NDIS delivers real change, to continue to use the DDA to challenge systemic discrimination, and to lobby for a jobs plan for people with disabilities.

The Guardian - Opinion

On the July 24 episode of Impact!, Joe challenged Booker T to contest their rematch in a Six Sides of Steel Cage match, which Booker T accepted after adding that weapons would be allowed in the match.

Wikipedia

On the July 24 episode of Impact!, Joe challenged Booker T to contest their championship match inside a 16 foot (4.9 m) high steel structure with six sides known as Six Sides of Steel, which Booker T accepted and added the stipulation that weapons would be allowed in the match.

Wikipedia

He's challenged to a friendly dance contest by some young men, one of them played by Savion Glover, who ultimately wears the older man down.

The New York Times

Keats, whom Hunt liked to challenge to speed-sonnet-writing contests, dedicated his first volume of poetry to him, while Dickens made his childlike optimism the subject of a wounding caricature.

The New Yorker

It was a margin wide enough that neither side made a major effort to contest or challenge votes to try to flip a state.

The New York Times

The FBI's last-minute submission of new material has drawn fire from Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ), who calls it an attempt "to contest and challenge the independent NAS panel's draft findings".

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context clearly establishes why contesting the matter is difficult, providing the reader with a clear understanding of the situation's strength or validity.

Common error

Avoid using "challenging to contest" in informal or casual conversation. The phrase is relatively formal and sounds out of place in everyday contexts. Opt for simpler alternatives like "hard to argue with" or "difficult to challenge".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "challenging to contest" functions as an adjective phrase describing the difficulty of disputing a claim or situation. It's an infinitive phrase providing more insight in the nature of the challenge.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "challenging to contest" describes something that is difficult to dispute or argue against. Linguistically, it functions as an infinitive phrase with formal and professional register. While the phrase is grammatically correct, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not frequently used, signaling that more common alternatives might be preferred in many contexts. Alternatives such as "difficult to dispute" or "hard to challenge" may be more suitable for broader audiences. To best utilize the expression ensure you are in a formal environment.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

difficult to dispute

Focuses on the difficulty of arguing against something, emphasizing the lack of valid counterarguments.

hard to challenge

Highlights the difficulty in questioning or opposing something due to its strength or validity.

tough to refute

Emphasizes the strength of evidence making it hard to prove something wrong.

difficult to argue with

Highlights the strength of a statement or fact that makes disagreement difficult.

unlikely to be challenged

Suggests a low probability of someone questioning or disputing something.

resistant to contestation

Formal phrasing that describes something strong that can't be easily contested.

not easily opposed

Indicates that resistance or opposition is difficult to mount.

unassailable

A strong, formal word implying something is so strong that is impossible to attack, question, or defeat.

impregnable

Similar to "unassailable", suggesting an inability to be successfully attacked or questioned.

beyond dispute

Focuses on the idea that there is no room for argument or disagreement.

FAQs

What does "challenging to contest" mean?

The phrase "challenging to contest" means something is difficult to argue against or dispute, typically because of strong evidence or a logical argument. It suggests that any attempt to challenge it would likely be unsuccessful.

When is it appropriate to use "challenging to contest"?

It's appropriate to use "challenging to contest" in formal writing or discussions where you want to emphasize the difficulty of opposing a particular claim or situation. It is often found in legal, academic, or business contexts.

What are some alternatives to "challenging to contest"?

Alternatives include "difficult to dispute", "hard to challenge", or "tough to refute". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

How does "challenging to contest" differ from "difficult to understand"?

"Challenging to contest" refers to the difficulty in opposing or disputing something, while "difficult to understand" refers to the difficulty in comprehending something. They address different types of difficulties: one relates to opposition, the other to comprehension.