The phrase "challenging texts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to written materials that are difficult to understand or require significant effort to comprehend.
Example: "In our literature class, we will be analyzing several challenging texts that explore complex themes and ideas."
Alternatives: "difficult readings" or "complex texts".
Then we wonder why reading scores are so low and why kids enter college unable to deal with challenging texts!
Scientific translation involves an unusual set of aptitudes, including a broad grasp of scientific concepts, a highly specialized vocabulary in two or more languages, well-honed research skills, and the ability to reproduce challenging texts from a second language without sacrificing accuracy, clarity, or style in the first.
Research indicates a trend toward less challenging texts in high school, and students are becoming weaker at grasping complex readings and using them as a basis for an argument, Education Week says.
Those standards require students to read challenging texts, integrate knowledge and ideas from multiple sources, identify key pieces of evidence and examine how words are used in context (in other words, the exact mental practices being employed by anyone reading this blog post).
You can improve your reading and writing skills by reading challenging texts and writing whenever you get the chance.
It was Ralph Fiennes, a fellow graduate of the Almeida of the 1990s, who came to me asking to play the part of Halvard Solness, because he had reached that stage in his life when only the most challenging texts attracted him.
Students will not likely choose sufficiently challenging text on their own; they need to be challenged and supported to build their strength as readers by stretching to the next level".
Although depicted quite differently in the press, the challenged text never uses a limiting adverb such as these.
Tools for Teen Moms includes daily behavioral challenges, text message reminders, discussion forums, and a repository of information and references as a comprehensive social media strategy.
While many would agree that racial slurs are unacceptable, this argument contains some troubling assumptions: that reading challenging, provocative texts will further a national divide, and that honest depiction of racial bigotry is the same as acceptance of it.
From the length of sentences and words, SMOG calculates the number of years of schooling a reader needs in order to comprehend a text, and Flesch determines how challenging the text is to read.
