Sentence examples for challenging deportation from inspiring English sources

Thousands of poor immigrants swamp the system every month in the city alone, challenging deportation orders or other administrative actions, but they are not entitled to free legal representation, as they are in criminal courts.

Britain has been given permission to intervene in a case already lodged against the Netherlands at the Strasbourg court by a 22-year-old Algerian challenging deportation, according to a spokeswoman for the court.

A few years earlier, in Los Angeles, an organizer named Fred Ross had started a Mexican-American-advocacy group called the Community Service Organization, devoted to small-scale activism: fighting racist establishments, helping with immigration forms, challenging deportations.

Such detainees face long delays as they challenge deportation.

Legal rights enabling migrants to challenge deportation orders would also be curbed.

More than 200 successfully challenge deportation on human rights grounds each year, and about 90 per cent cite the "right to private and family life" under Article 8 of the convention.

In two decisions this term, a narrow majority viewed laws that cut back on immigrants' ability to challenge deportation and detention policies as a threat to the principle that the Constitution protects noncitizens as well as citizens.

Many thousands of immigrants have been affected by the delays because the authorities have started to hold many more of them in detention while the immigrants challenge deportation orders or seek political asylum through the courts.

These provisions were adopted as part of the same 1996 immigration law that the court reviewed in its decision on Monday that also rejected the government's legal interpretation and gave immigrants a right to judicial hearings to challenge deportation policies.

Among the rulings he was proudest of, his law former clerks said, were a 1980 decision upholding regulations barring sex discrimination in education, a 1987 decision applying the principle of one-person-one-vote to New York City's Board of Estimate, and a 2000 decision allowing illegal immigrants to challenge deportation orders in court.

Liberals' pleasure at the result was tempered by just that element of deference, because many important immigration cases challenge deportations, and seek to require courts to oversee I.N.S. decisions to a degree this opinion clearly bars.