challenge the accuracy of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "challenge the accuracy of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when questioning or disputing the correctness or truthfulness of information or data. Example: "The researcher decided to challenge the accuracy of the previous study's findings, citing new evidence that contradicted the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

The admissibility of expert testimony to challenge the accuracy of a prosecution witness varies across the country.

The New York Times

Mr. Wible went on to challenge the accuracy of other statements Ms. Jones-Grant had made on the stand.

The New York Times

A letter to the editor published on Dec. 29 does not challenge the accuracy of the Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin's ongoing assault against Bishop William Murphy.

The New York Times

Others question her methods and data in her own experiment in faking mental illness or challenge the accuracy of her description of some famous past experiments.

The New York Times - Books

At one point Mr. Bush turned to Ms. Swiebocka and asked, "Do people challenge the accuracy of what you present?" Mr. Fleischer, who was accompanying the president a few paces behind, said he could not hear the answer.

The New York Times

In the first day of the hearing, Elliott, for the Harrises, foreshadowed calling an expert witness, Dr Daniel Martins, to challenge the accuracy of the flows at the Bourke gauge.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Stu has challenged the accuracy of my work.

The New Yorker

After the firing, Comey's defenders publicly challenged the accuracy of that statement.

The Washington Post

The main opposition candidate, Levan Gachechiladze, challenged the accuracy of the poll, which was conducted by four Georgian television stations.

The New York Times

Democrats have responded with "report cards" -- graded assessments of those comments, accompanied by footnotes challenging the accuracy of Republicans' assertions.

The New York Times

Labour has not challenged the accuracy of the Mail on Sunday leak but has not commented further.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "challenge the accuracy of", ensure that you have credible evidence or reasoning to support your challenge. Avoid making unsubstantiated claims.

Common error

Avoid using "challenge the accuracy of" when you simply disagree with something without having concrete evidence. This phrase implies a serious questioning based on tangible discrepancies.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "challenge the accuracy of" functions as a verb phrase used to express disagreement with or questioning of the correctness of something. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "challenge the accuracy of" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to question the correctness or truthfulness of something. Ludwig confirms the validity of this expression. It is frequently found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, it is important to have credible evidence or reasoning to support your challenge. Alternatives such as "question the veracity of" or "dispute the correctness of" can be used depending on the context. Be mindful not to overstate your challenge without sufficient evidence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

question the veracity of

Focuses specifically on the truthfulness of something.

dispute the correctness of

Directly argues against the accuracy or rightness of something.

call into question the precision of

Highlights doubts about the exactness or meticulousness of something.

contest the validity of

Raises objections about whether something is well-founded or legitimate.

doubt the reliability of

Expresses uncertainty about the consistency or dependability of something.

take issue with the exactitude of

Formally disagrees with the meticulousness or precision of something.

cast doubt on the authenticity of

Implies uncertainty about whether something is genuine or real.

express skepticism regarding the fidelity of

Communicates doubt about how accurately something represents the original.

raise objections to the dependability of

Highlights concerns about the trustworthiness or reliability of something.

scrutinize the legitimacy of

Examines carefully the lawfulness or permissibility of something.

FAQs

How can I use "challenge the accuracy of" in a sentence?

You can use "challenge the accuracy of" when you want to express that you are questioning whether something is correct or true. For example, "The scientist decided to challenge the accuracy of the previous study's findings after observing contradictory results."

What are some alternatives to "challenge the accuracy of"?

You can use alternatives like "question the veracity of", "dispute the correctness of", or "doubt the reliability of" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to "challenge the accuracy of" or "question the accuracy of"?

"Challenge the accuracy of" implies a more direct and forceful questioning, often with supporting evidence, whereas "question the accuracy of" is a more general expression of doubt.

What does it mean to "challenge the accuracy of" something?

To "challenge the accuracy of" something means to formally question its correctness or truthfulness, often implying that you have evidence or reason to believe it may be incorrect.