Suggestions(2)
Exact(48)
Serum cortisol, IGF-1, and TNF-α concentration were also increased as the result of LPS challenge (P < 0.05).
Splenic Doppler resistive index was reduced after fluid challenge in responders (0.66 [±0.12] before and 0.56 [±0.12] after fluid challenge; p < 0.001) while was unchanged in non-responders (0.65 [±0.07] before and 0.65 [±0.08] after fluid challenge; p = 0.601).
Lymphocyte count was elevated at 2 h and reduced at 12 h post-challenge as the result of LPS challenge (P < 0.05).
Vaccinated mice showed significant (around six-fold) retardation of tumor volume in comparison to non-vaccinated animals for 3 weeks after the tumor challenge (p < 0.001).
Post hoc analysis by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test specified a statistically significant increase in K i in mediastinal LNs post-exposure compared with the K i values prior to virus challenge (p < 0.015, Fig. 3a).
While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge" (p. 142)." Interestingly, back in the day when I was at Environmental Defense Fund, I was told by Republican staffers to always use the phrase "climate change" instead of "global warming" when talking to their bosses.
Similar(12)
Previously, we reported that mice immunized with Ag85B-encoding DNA were protected against MTB challenge (P-mice) while adjuvant-free Ag85B protein boosting in mice primed with Ag85B-encoding DNA (NP-mice) did not confer protection (10, 36).
Passively sensitized guinea pigs weighing 450 to 500 g were assigned into two groups: saline challenge (P-OA/Sal) and OA challenge (P-OA/OA) groups (n = 8 for each group).
White blood cell counts were increased in the LPS-treated pigs at 2 and 4 h post-challenge (P < 0.01).
EOXB supplementation decreased the fecal score compared to the challenged CTR animals during the first week post-challenge (P = 0.02).
Rectal temperatures increased as the result of LPS injection at 4 and 12 h post-challenge (P < 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com