Sentence examples for cfs properties from inspiring English sources

Data presented in this study were generated by systematically compiling and interlinking information from three different sources: The FCEC report to the European Commission [[11]] for information on CFS properties of approved active substances (approval status as of 31 January 2013).

The following HSID methods were compared: crash frequency (CF), equivalent property damage only (EPDO) crash frequency, crash rate (CR), proportion method (P), empirical Bayes estimate of total-crash frequency (EB), empirical Bayes estimate of severe-crash frequency (EBs), and potential for improvement (PFI).

Working in term of pdfs and/or cfs, the stochastic properties of the response process are full described.

This slowed responding of the dyspareunia group during the sex-AST may reflect a relatively strong attention-grabbing power (cf. Pratto & John, 1991) or relatively strong arousing properties (cf. Schimmack, 2005) of sexual stimuli within the dyspareunia group, possibly because of their threatening nature.

For both the accuracy and performance concern, we use a standard prediction solution, collaborative filtering (CF) as the benchmark, which is widely used and analysed in terms of these properties, cf. [11, 12] or [5, 6].

We see two potential explanations for this: either anti-phasic motion is not excited in healthy, acoustically-stimulated cochleae (perhaps owing to the hearing organ's visco-elastic properties, cf. refs.8,57), or it is so small that it becomes swamped by other forms of motion.

The acid treatment adversely affected the nanocomposite tensile properties (cf. EVA-1XF).

Such a dynamical system is easily predictable due to its topological properties (cf. Guckenheimer and Holmes 1990, p. 42f).

In this section, we study on the Carlitz polynomials and their properties (cf. [6, 7, 9, 11, 14], and the references cited in each of these earlier works).

For s > 0, the resolvent J s B of the maximal monotone operator B on ℋ has the following properties, cf. [9].

The third response raises questions about the distinction between the object and the theory conception of the physical and associated issues about dispositional and categorical properties (cf. Chalmers 1996, Lockwood 1992, and Stoljar 2000, 2001).