Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Of the tested CEs materials, enhanced solar cell performance was observed with Cu2S CE than the CoS or NiS CEs while brass substrae was found to be a better substrate than FTO for these CE materials.
Similar(59)
This design strategy has potential in fabricating highly efficient and low-cost CE materials with FTO-free substrates for DSCs.
Therefore, the Fe2O3/GFs composites exhibit great potential in low-cost and highly efficient CE materials for DSSCs.
The design of efficient non-Pt counter electrode (CE) materials is highly desired in field of dye sensitized solar cell (DSC).
The strategy is simple and efficient; thus, it is promising for fabricating cost-effective CE materials for dye-sensitized solar cells.
The PCE also outperformed that of Pt CE based cell (6.20%), manifesting the application potential of CoS2 G as low cost non-Pt CE materials for DSSC.
Here, we demonstrate newly designed counter electrode (CE) materials of onion-like nitrogen-doped carbon encapsulating metal alloys (ONC@MAs) such as FeNi3 (orC@FeCo3) ONC@FeCo(ONC@FeCo), by a facile and scalable pyrolysis method.
Pt-free CE materials such as poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), carbon spheres, and tantalum carbide (TaC) exhibit high catalytic activities toward the I3−/I− and Co3+/2+ redox couples with no cost concerns, although Pt remains the ideal CE catalyst.
Here, we propose an alternative design for the fabrication of low-cost and Pt-free CE materials by constructing fast electron transport network and creating highly active sites on the electron pathway using graphene and Fe2O3 nanoparticles.
Up to date, the design of low-cost Pt-free CE materials with an ideal combination of high electrical conductivity, excellent catalytic activity and satisfactory long-term electrochemical stability still poses challenges to researchers.
In addition, when the obtained composites are used as counter electrode (CE) materials in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), the corresponding energy conversion efficiency is as high as 7.32%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com