Sentence examples for ces costs from inspiring English sources

CES costs $300 and the tickets to LV and the hotel will cost far more.

This is defined as the cost of one cubic meter of water applied to crops, and is the sum of investment (Ca), maintenance (Cm) and energy (Ce) costs.

Abbreviations: CE, cost-effectiveness WTP, willingness to pay; QALY, quality-adjusted life year Fig. 4 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Discounted at the rate of 5% Abbreviations: CE, Cost-Effectiveness; ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; QALYs, Quality-Adjusted Life Years.

Abbreviations: ΔC; costs intervention group-costs control group, ΔE; effects intervention group-effects control group, 95%CI; 95% confidence interval, ICER; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, CE; cost-effectiveness, I; intervention group, C; control group, €; Euros, FCA; friction cost approach, HCM; human capital method.

*most effective is defined based on the highest incremental QALY and the reverse; #primary prevention for CVD; $secondary prevention for CVD; ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; CE: cost-effective ness); best is defined as most effecost-effective nesss and worse as the least effective bestd on the same measurement; the numbers correspond to the DMP numbers is Table  4.

An overview of the legal and regulatory framework defining benefits for England is given in Table  1.> -wrap-foot> needed, C costs, E effectiveness, CE cost-effectiveness, B budget (from [ 1, 2, 3], DH website (http://www.dh.gov.uk/home/fs/en), HMSO website (http://www.hmso.gov.uk/), expert advice (see Acknowledgements)) a "Explicit is subdivided as 1: all necessary"; 2: areas of care; 3: items.

The key assumptions considered in the model are briefly presented in Table  1 and described below in detail.> -wrap-foot> cost-effectivenessness; HR: hazard ratio; QALYs: quality-adjusted life years; LYs: life years; ICER: incremental cost effectiveness ratio; CV: cardiovascular; NYHA: New York Heart Association.

The number of animals sampled at each farm (b = 11) was calculated based on the formula b = √ ce/cd)(1 − re/re), where ce is cost of a sample into two clusters (10); cd, sample cost of two units of interest in a same cluster (1) and the correlation intra-conglomerates (re) was (0.04) [ 20].

(mathbf Ce =) Cost inside the direction zone.

(mathbf a =) Magnitude of the direction zone; (mathbf Ce =) Cost inside the direction zone.