"certain rationality" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can refer to logical thought or a reasoned approach to something. For example, "To make the best decision, we need to approach the problem with certain rationality."
These repetitions encourage the re-creation of particular suites of landforms and could be taken to imply a certain rationality to events.
"If you're living in a poor neighborhood deprived of options, there's a certain rationality to keep taking a drug that will give you some temporary pleasure," Dr. Hart said in an interview, arguing that the caricature of enslaved crack addicts comes from a misinterpretation of the famous rat experiments.
She effectively adapted the lessons of classical Cubism (as in the work of Georges Braque and Pablo Picasso), using it as a point of departure for an original style of her own, softening Cubism's rational scheme with an uncommon wealth of shade and nuance of colour and a certain rationality that was more characteristic of Russian art.
Porphyry accords certain rationality to the animals and in general emphasizes what they have in common with us humans.
His view implies that democratic legitimacy only obtains if the outcomes themselves satisfy certain quality conditions specifically, he postulated that they should satisfy certain rationality axioms.
Whilst others might call this irrational, Weber [25] argues that these actions have a certain rationality as these values are a means to an end also.
Rationality is claimed by Davidson to be constitutive of the mental in the sense that something only counts as being a mind and thus an appropriate object of psychological attributions if it meets up to certain rational standards.
There is a certain notion of rationality that starts from the assumption that each of us is, in essence, a monad designed to maximize profit and pleasure.
Many people have thought that this kind of understanding can be gained only by empathizing with the person by "putting oneself in his shoes"; others have thought that it requires judging the person according to certain norms of rationality that are not part of natural science.
Perhaps his most startling thesis (built on elementary mathematics) was the "impossibility theorem" (or "Arrow's theorem"), which holds that, under certain conditions of rationality and equality, it is impossible to guarantee that a ranking of societal preferences will correspond to rankings of individual preferences when more than two individuals and alternative choices are involved.
Does it matter whether she is guided by certain principles of rationality?
