Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
C1 is negative control 1 (no cerulenin or ethanol); C2 is negative control 2 (with ethanol), Cer 1 μM, Cer 5 μM, and Cer 25 μM are three experimental groups treated with 1, 5, and 25 μM of cerulenin, respectively.
Figure 4 compares WAXD patterns of mechanical mixture of the powders of amino-MMT particles and polymerized CER (1) and the CER/amino-MMT nanocomposite (2) with the identical contents of amino-MMT (5 wt. %).
The evaluation for subgroup effects, or heterogeneity of treatment effects, is a critical issue in CER (1, 8, 10– 10).
These genes include WM27B, DL, YAB1, YABBY4, WM 5, CER 1, and WBLH1, which have been implicated in flower development.
35, 36 In human epidermis, three distinct acylCer species which contain a different sphingoid base; i.e., sphingosine, 6-hydroxy sphingosine and 4-hydroxysphinganine (or phytosphingosine), for the acylCer species Cer 1 (EOS), Cer 4 (EOH), and Cer 9 (EOP), respectively 33 (Fig. 1 ), have been identified.
Similar(51)
Requirements are often specified in terms of average CER, and a typical value is CER ≤10−5.
Table 4 Details of pessimistic scenarios Pessimistic scenario Absence of 1 Tipping fee 2 Initial cost (land and machineries) 3 CER 4 Tipping fee, initial cost, and CER.
Tumor specimens from premenopausal patients had significantly lower levels of CER (14.6 +/- 1.5 (mean +/- SEM) 8S binding fmole/mg protein) compared with carcinomas from postmenopausal patients (57.5 +/- 3.9 fmole/mg protein; p less than 0.001).
In another scenario where the radius increases while the number of contacts is kept unchanged (Figure 4d), the specific stiffness κ 4 = N 4 cEr 4 = N 1 cE ( J r 1 ) = J κ 1.
The collision energies, with nitrogen in the collision cell, were +43 V for CER, −72 V for IPC, −80 V for MIPC, and −75 V for M IP 2C.
Notably, cynomolgus monkey had significantly lower levels of glycosphingolipids, including GluCer (p<0.0005) and GM3 (p<0.0005), but higher level of Cer (p<0.0005) in plasma than human.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com