Atkinson et al. [ 19] found that users wanted easy access to sorted and rated published evidence, user-centred capability (e.g. tailored information and user support) and interactive features (e.g. connecting users with similar interests).
To this end, we first highlight how its roots in capability-centred justice theory make energy justice well-placed for addressing energy debates in terms of individuals' ability to influence their own energy realities.
These are in the main related to the nature of homecare tasks and practices, and person-centred characteristics and capabilities, and to a lesser extent, problems with the technology and devices, organisational issues, and environmental factors.
Providing individuals with health information and actively involving them in health decisions are key components of patient centred health care that enhances capability for self-management.
The present paper builds on one of the most influential criticisms of the dominating growth-centred traditions of economics: Amartya Sen's capability approach.
This internationally agreed set of human-centred design processes provides a definition of the capability that an organization must possess in order to implement user-centred design effectively.
While distributive energy justice as applied to conventional energy contexts focuses primarily on burden/benefit distributions, our study presents an alternative conceptualisation, in line with capability-centred justice (the 'Energy justice and the capability approach' section), of distributive justice in a small-scale decentralised energy context.
Using Sen's (1999) Capability Approach and Ash's (2014) object centred account of affect, I examine how the technological artefact is engineered to produce an affective experience of safety that responds to structural inequalities.
The concept of capability-centred justice is introduced by Sen [11], who defines capability as 'a person's freedom to pursue functionings that he/she has reason to value' ([12], p. 4 5), where functionings are what constitute a person's being with both a well-being and an agency aspect ([12], p. 59-62).
All consultations were patient-centred and tailored to the participant's physical activity preferences, capability, medical limitations (if present) and personal barriers.
By identifying transformational periods, critical events and developmental actions in the evolution of design, the analysis suggests that expert-centred, tool-centred, strategy-centred, and process-centred approaches to developing design are not optional methods but rather phases in the broader capability development process, which bases on the transforming object of the business activity.
