Sentence examples for centralization without from inspiring English sources
The phrase "centralization without" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English
One example of how to use it could be: "The company's decision to implement centralization without proper communication led to confusion among employees." This sentence implies that the process of centralization occurred, but without proper communication or explanation, causing negative consequences.
He gets all the actual work of running the country – a nasty by-product of paranoia and centralization – without the pomp and circumstance, and eagerly awaited appearances on foreign TV, of the presidency.
In Piedmont and Sardinia the long reign of Charles Emmanuel III (ruled 1730 73) further developed Savoyard militaristic absolutism and administrative centralization without the liberal spirit of Enlightenment reform.
He gets all the actual work of running the country - a nasty by-product of paranoia and centralization - without the pomp and circumstance, and eagerly awaited appearances on foreign TV, of the presidency.
Networks can be programmed and policies can be changed without separation of data and control plane, without centralization of control, and without OpenFlow [4, 5].
But central authorities have many downsides, and new technology is enabling organization without centralization.
Turns out it really is possible to achieve coordination without centralization.
But such centralization (with or without offsetting decentralization) has potential flaws of its own, and may be extremely hard to enact and implement in a deeply polarized era.
Without centralization, blockchains have to work doubly hard to encourage "good" user behavior.
Single units combine into a system or "series of units" without the centralization of state authority (ibid., 142 8).
This process suggests a centralization of intensive care may be occurring even without central planning.
Centralization can lead to price controls, censorship without due process, lack of reader privacy, and resistance to innovators.
