The central heights of the residual ripple after unloading are 1.041, 0.907, 0.698, and 0.689 nm for indentation velocities of 25, 50, 75, and 100 m/s, respectively.
The central heights of the residual ripple after unloading are 0.998, 1.104, 1.253, and 1.3224 nm for indentation depths of 0, 0.4, 0.4, and 0.6 nm, respectively.
The central heights of the residual ripple after unloading are 0.946, 1.026, 1.041, and 1.047 nm for 0, 200, 300, and 400 K, respectively.
The daylight factor model given by Charted Institute of Building Services Engineers CIBSEE) was modified in this paper to incorporate time variations with respect to zenith angle (θz) and vertical height (h) of working surface above ground surface which was normalized with central height (H) of skylight dome.
The level of the screw determines the central height, while the offset sizes of the articular component determine the peripheral height.
Bone morphometric software (QDR4500A Lateral Image Analyze, Hologic Inc., USA) was used to measure the anterior edge height, central height, and the posterior edge height of each vertebra from the fourth thoracic vertebra to the fourth lumbar vertebra.
Beck Index (BI) and absolute heights (mm) with comparison to reference heights was favored over simply reporting kyphotic angles because crush fractures can display a simple overall height loss without kyphotic deformation and biconcave fractures can have a severe central height loss with relative maintenance of anterior and posterior edge heights without a kyphotic deformation either.
The dam now has a central crest height of 60 m (above river level) reaching an elevation of 961.0 m; the width along the crest is 230.5 m and along the middle part it is 444.5 m; the downstream slope was shaped with a slope of 1 2.5. Figure 7 Panchromatic Quickbird image (0.5 m resolution) of the dam site after the blast (in 2011) with underground spillway and penstock shown by blue lines.
Targets appeared in-line with central fixation (height of 1.4○ of a visual angle), pseudo-randomly to the LVF or RVF, stimuli subtended 2○ (inner edge)- up to 7.6○ (outer edge) of visual angle horizontally from the centre point.
The results agree with the trivial differences of the simulated central gap heights of the interface between the two shafts and the enlargement of the simulated tilt angles by the hollow shaft.
