"censorship without" is a grammatically correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where censorship is absent or not present. For example, - "In a society that values freedom of speech, censorship without proper justification is considered unacceptable." - "The film festival prides itself on promoting diverse voices and ideas, allowing for creativity to flourish without censorship."
The code seeks to establish that antisemitism cannot be used as a pretext for censorship without evidence of antisemitic intent.
Centralization can lead to price controls, censorship without due process, lack of reader privacy, and resistance to innovators.
Google, after all, once believed that it could handle censorship without sustaining long-term damage to its character and image.
By representing the grass-mud horse and the river crab in pictures, people people can invoke the idea of Chinese censorship without even using words.
The present fight is like the fight I put up to keep "The Moon Is Blue" exactly the way I made it, without censorship, without cuts.
Censorship — even the kind of small-"c" censorship, without which no magazine or social-media platform or comedy club can endure — never is.
That looks like a formula for media self-censorship without tarnishing the government's claim to uphold media freedom.In this section Prairie madness and the strong loonie North, south or both No great expectations Castro's grim phoney war Stoning the messenger Correction Reprints Related items CorrectionMay 22nd 2003.
"Major online platforms already err towards censorship even without the legal pressure to over-comply," says Chinmayi Arun of proposed changes to India's IT Act.
While the decision to route mainland Chinese users to Hong Kong is an attempt by Google to skirt censorship requirements without running afoul of Chinese laws, it appears to have angered officials in China, setting the stage for a possible escalation of the conflict, which may include blocking the Hong Kong search service in mainland China.
This would be the case not only in a totalitarian society, under a dictatorship, in one-party states, but also in a democracy (representative, parliamentary, or 'direct') where the majority does not result from the development of independent thought and opinion but rather from the monopolistic or oligopolistic administration of public opinion, without terror and (normally) without censorship.
"By the same token," the report continued, "if the Cuban government wishes to make information available without censorship, it will allow the independent collections to operate without interference".
