Exact(2)
FP i): Female population; CEB(i): Children ever born; CA(i): Children alive; CD i): Children dead; P i): Average parity; D i): Proportion of children dead; K i): Multiplier; qx(i): Probability of dying; lx(i): Probability of surviving; ML: Mortality level; Ref. P: Reference period.
FP i): Women's population; CEB(i) : Children ever born; BIPY : Births in the past one year prior the survey; P(I) : Average parities reported; f(i) : Preliminary fertility schedule; φ(i) : Cumulated fertility schedule for a period; F i) : Average parity equivalents for a period; f + (i) : Fertility Schedule for conventional five-year age groups; f* i) : The adjusted total fertility rate.
Similar(58)
Predicted values by ACI 318-11 (ACI Committee 2011), CEB-FIP Model (CEB-FIP 1993) and KCI Code, EN 1991 Code (EN 1991 1991 NZSS 3101 (New Zealand Standard 1995), CSA A 23.3 (CSA Technical Committee 2004) overestimated observed values in Group I and II.
Achintha and Burgoyne (2013) showed that the estimations from all models, but the CEB-FIP code (1991) which underestimates G C,I, give predictions that match well with values to be expected from tests; and found that among these models, the empirical model of Bazant and Becq-Giraudon is the best that precisely estimates the mode-I fracture energy of concrete (G C,I ).
The standards Model Code 2010 (CEB-FIB 2013) and ACI 318 (ACI 2008) provide alternative approaches.
The walls are either earth-based, i.e. Compressed Earth Blocks (CEBs) or Adobe, or based on cement-based materials such as hollow concrete blocks.
A comparative study on determining the crack extension resistance curves (KR-curves) for the complete fracture process associated with two functions of the cohesive stress distribution, i.e. Peterson's softening curve and CEB-FIP Model, 1990 softening curve using an analytical method and the weight function approach is presented in this paper.
CEB designed the maximum likelihood analysis, with assistance from MAD, AJT and JKC; CEB performed the maximum likelihood analysis.
Further studies of CEB in relation to specific clinical diagnosis are needed to clarify sensitivity and specificity of CEB.
The predicted value of split tensile strength by proposed model, ACI code (ACI 363R-92, State of art report on high strength concrete (ACI Committee 363) (Reapproved 1997) and CEB-FIP model (CEB-FIP, Committee Euro-International du Beton (CEB-FIB), CEB-FIB Model Code 1990) are compared in Fig. 15.
CeB, Belgium Some names have been withheld or changed to protect anonymity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com