ceased for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ceased for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as it does not convey a clear meaning in this context. Example: "The project ceased for a lack of funding."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Talk of adding more school aid has ceased for now.

The New York Times

The crew was immediately raised aloft to the roof and work ceased for about two hours.

The New York Times

In 1951, records show, service to Englewood Cliffs ceased for good.

The New York Times - Travel

In Pakistan, reporting on Shahzad's case ceased, for the most part, after a few weeks.

The New Yorker

The pope endorsed the bans in 1679, and transfusion all but ceased for a century.

The Guardian

From that moment on, Bandar believed, political pressure from the White House ceased for good.

The New Yorker

But many of those places ceased for financial, not health, reasons.

The New York Times

Layoffs have ceased for the time being and firms are competing for bankers.

The Economist

Bloodshed between Israelis and Palestinians ceased for the first time in Bush's presidency.

The Washington Post

Except for military advances, technological improvements ceased for the next 150 years.

Stanford University

After the great world slump, which started in 1929, international investment almost ceased for lack of profit opportunities.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing why something stopped, replace "ceased for" with more precise phrases like "stopped due to", "ended because of", or "halted as a result of" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "ceased for" to indicate a cause-and-effect relationship. This phrase is grammatically awkward. Instead, clearly state the reason using constructions such as "stopped because of" or "ended due to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ceased for" is generally intended to function as a causal connector, attempting to link an action's termination with a reason. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, its usage is typically incorrect. It is advisable to use more grammatically sound alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

33%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Academia

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "ceased for" appears frequently across various sources, its grammatical correctness is questionable. Ludwig AI indicates its usage is generally incorrect. When aiming to express that something has stopped due to a specific reason, it's best to opt for clearer, more grammatically sound alternatives like "stopped because of", "ended due to", or "halted as a result of". These alternatives ensure that your writing is both precise and adheres to standard English grammar. Given its prevalence despite its grammatical issues, be cautious when encountering "ceased for" and consider it a signal to rephrase for improved clarity and accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stopped because of

Replaces "ceased for" with a more direct and grammatically standard causal construction.

halted due to

Similar to "stopped because of", but uses "halted" for a more formal tone and "due to" for explicit causation.

discontinued as a result of

A more elaborate phrase indicating a consequence, suitable for formal contexts.

terminated because of

Implies a more definitive and permanent end, due to a specific cause.

was interrupted by

Focuses on the interruption aspect, highlighting that something stopped due to an external factor.

ended on account of

Uses "on account of" to provide a reason for the ending, suitable for formal writing.

was suspended owing to

Suggests a temporary halt caused by something, using "owing to" for a formal tone.

came to an end because

A more descriptive way of saying something stopped, emphasizing the completion aspect.

was abolished due to

Indicates a formal or official ending, often used for systems, laws, or practices.

was no longer in effect because of

Emphasizes the lack of effectiveness as the reason for cessation, suitable for policies or rules.

FAQs

How can I properly use a phrase to indicate that something has stopped due to a specific reason?

Instead of using the awkward phrase "ceased for", consider alternatives such as "stopped because of", "halted due to", or "ended as a result of" depending on the context. Each of these provides a clearer and more grammatically correct way to express causation.

Is "ceased for" considered grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "ceased for" is not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's better to use more precise and standard English phrases like "stopped because of" or "halted due to".

What are some common mistakes people make when trying to express that something has stopped?

One common mistake is using grammatically incorrect or awkward phrases like "ceased for". It's more effective to use direct and clear language such as "ended because of" or "stopped due to".

Are there instances where "ceased for" might be appropriate?

While the phrase "ceased for" is generally discouraged due to its awkward construction, it's almost always better to use a clearer alternative. For example, instead of "The project ceased for lack of funding", use "The project stopped because of a lack of funding".