Historically, the allocation of both capital and labour have shifted during the growth process from low productivity sectors to high ones, causing the rate of growth of output to exceed the weighted average of the rates of growth of total inputs.
In this case, the articulatory suppression hampered the vocal rehearsal of information visually presented, causing the rate of correct responses to decline without the phonological loop aid.
However, dispersal is a double-edged sword because too much can homogenize genetic variation across all populations, reducing the benefits of dispersal, and causing the rate of coevolution to drop off at very high levels of dispersal (Vogwill et al. 2008).
At very high rates of reinforcement, the reference response swamps all other behaviours, causing the rate of measured operant responding to approach its maximum value, Rmax.
This is surprising, given that they have very different proton wires, causing the rate of ESPT to differ by a factor of up to 30.
The primary sources of error on this number are due to our conservative annotation approach (causing the rate of gain to be underestimated) and missed homologs in other species (leading to an overestimate).
