This effectively reverses the direction of explanation favored by Uṃveka, who is instead concerned to argue that the status of being truth-conducive is caused by the same factors that cause veridical cognitions.
But this link obscures the fact that, on a psychological level, suicide is often caused by the same factors no matter who you are or where you are—feelings of isolation and despair; a sense that there are no other options; and inadequate access to mental health services.
Indirect evidence is not conclusive, however, because alternative explanations (other than GR and ER being caused by the same factors) are quite plausible.
If adoptees differ from the general population, this could be caused by the same factors, including genetic load, leading to pregnancy and adoption, and/or the difference may be an effect of living as an adoptee.
For a reflective latent variable, observed indicators are expected to be at least moderately correlated, as they are thought to be caused by the same underlying factor that captures all their common variance.
Overall, approximately half of the observed variance in the evolution rates seems to result from purely technical factors (sampling deviation and distance calculation errors), limiting our ability to detect deviating groups of genes even when the nontechnical component of the deviation is caused by the same biological factors.
A significant genetic correlation implies that there is a significant correlation between traits caused by common genetic factors; a significant environmental correlation implies that there is a significant correlation between traits caused by the same environmental factors.
The probability that controls suffered from diseases putatively caused by the same risk factors as the patients with CRC is extremely low.
In SW Amazonia, the difference is caused by the same two factors in the opposite direction: using pan-Amazonian wood density and D H relationships here results in an overestimate of AGB.
In general, genetic research comparing abilities and disabilities suggests that what we call learning disability is merely the low end of the normal distribution of learning ability and caused by the same genetic and environmental factors responsible for learning ability (Plomin & Kovas, 2005).
Using combined domains renders the study less sensitive to redundant findings on separate factors, caused by the same workers reporting low scores on several factors at the same time.
