"Spectacular Atomic Explosions Mean Progress in Defense, No Cause For Panic," said an editorial in the The Deseret News.
"It's not something I ever saw the cause for," Mr. Harris said.
"At this time there appears to be no credible cause for concern," said Karen Riley, a spokeswoman for the Food and Drug Administration.
"These figures should not prove cause for concern," said Ben Brettell, the senior economist of senior Hargreaves Lansdown.
"It's not just unfortunate, it's real cause for concern," said James Shapiro, a professor of English at Columbia University.
"It is cause for alarm," said Dr. Robert P. Hartwig, chief economist of the Insurance Information Institute, the industry's primary trade group.
"Twenty-six of the fatalities could have been avoided, and that is cause for concern," said Betsy Gotbaum, the public advocate.
"Obviously there is a cause for concern," said Jane Quimby, spokeswoman at the Denver office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
"The administration's action today is cause for disappointment," said Deirdre A. McQuade, a spokeswoman for the Pro-Life Secretariat at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
"Although disheartening, the case of Ebola in Liberia is no cause for panic," said Birte Hald, the team leader for Ebola coordination at the International Federation of Red Cross.
