Sentence examples for causation should be from inspiring English sources

In addition, assertions of genetic causation should be built on what is already known about the difficulties of explaining complex traits, including behaviour or intelligence.

Although many philosophers hold that explanations trace causes, there is still considerable disagreement about whether or not the notion of causation should be analyzed and, if so, how.

He still holds that the philosophical idea of causation should be seen as a primitive version of the scientific idea of causal laws.

Instead, some argue, causation should be regarded as a special sort of counterfactual dependence between states of certain types (Loewer 2002, 2007, Fodor 1990, Block 1997), or as a special sort of regularity that holds between them (Melnyk 2003).

Still other mechanists, such as Bogen (2005, 2008a) and Machamer (Machamer 2004), embrace an Anscombian, non-reductive view that causation should be understood in terms of productive activities (see also the entry on G.E.M. Anscombe).

The motivation for this model is that any polygenic component of disease causation should be shared among individuals according to their kinships.

Therefore, the disease causations should be studied on the basis of the entire body of knowledge including all genes that are associated with the clinical traits.

We note, however, that both our paper (1) and the Oldach et al. response are examples of the serendipitous pleasures that can be brought to the literature by classical citations, and that all orthodox medical theories on historical causations should be periodically reexamined.

A decade later the philosopher David Chalmers agreed: "It still seems utterly mysterious that the causation of behaviour should be accompanied by a subjective inner life". Even the physicist James Trefil concedes that "no matter how my brain works, no matter how much interplay there is between my brain and my body, one single fact remains..

Although we use a terminology, which suggests causation, the readers should be aware that we couldn't prove causality with the cross-sectional international data at hand.

However many of the studies quoted for support in cardiovascular disease confuse association with causation, and this should be noted.