Exact(5)
One of the most important and controversial questions about causal perception involves its origin: do we learn to see causality, or does this ability derive in part from innately specified aspects of our cognitive architecture?
Here we demonstrate analogous postdictive processing in infants' causal perception.
Here we explore causal perception in 7-month-old infants, using a different approach from previous work.
Moreover, this work provides a new way of demonstrating causal perception in infants that differs from previous strategies, and is immune to some previous types of critiques.
Recent work in adult visual cognition has demonstrated a postdictive aspect to causal perception: in certain situations, we can perceive a collision between two objects in an ambiguous display even after the moment of potential 'impact' has already passed.
Similar(55)
Perception, although it does not perform any intentional determination, is however capable of eliminating superimpositions via a causal process: perception gives rise, at the next moment, to another non-conceptual mental event in which the potential of the wrong superimposition to arise has been neutralized, thus preventing its subsequent arising.
Notice that appetite is causal, as perception is not [in the productive sense at least]" (Bennett, 253).
The second route to the understanding of "sensation" or "feeling" as sense-impressions is via the allegiance to causal theories of perception; one which construes perception as a natural phenomenon in the domain of which the notions of propagation, transmission, impulse, stimulus and response have their home.
But this latter consequence implies a causal theory of perception which is fundamentally antithetical to Kant's understanding of causality.
Physiological, causal accounts of perception cannot answer questions about perceptual successes and failures.
This thesis has been labeled the Causal Theory of Perception (henceforth it will be referred to as the CTP).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com