Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(33)
However, neutrophil counts were significantly decreased and lymphocytes were significantly increased in BTB-infected cattle (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001 respectively, Fig. 1).
There was a decrease in the number of neutrophils and monocytes engaged in phagocytosis in outdoor cattle (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) in comparison to those indoors.
In 2006, elk (P < 0.001) and cattle (P < 0.001) primarily used meadows and thinned conifer, while deer (P = 0.010) used thinned conifer and burns (Table 1).
In 2005, elk use did not differ (P > 0.621) among types, whereas cattle (P = 0.005) primarily used meadows and deer (P < 0.001) primarily used burns and thinned conifer (Table 1).
Abbreviations: min: minimum; q1: 1st quartile; q3: 3rd quartile; max; maximum Weight at slaughter appeared to be higher for BRL affected animals based on the descriptive statistics (Table 1), but there was no statistical difference in weight at slaughter between BRL affected and BRL unaffected groups for neither Danish Holsteins (P = 0.33) nor for Danish Red cattle (P = 0.21, Table 5).
Across both years, profit was greater for HI than LO cattle (P ≤ 0.02), but summer supplementation did not affect profit (P = 0.15).
Similar(27)
However, sward botanical composition had no effect on cattle behavior (P ≥ 0.05).
Haplotype frequencies were different between all three cattle populations (P < 0.01; Table 1).
The seroprevalence of MAP significantly increased with cattle age (P < 0.001) (Table 3) and was also significantly higher in cattle herds with > 150 cattle compared with smaller herds (P = 0.024).
Gene expression levels for the IL2, IL4 and IFNG gene were not significantly different between BTB-infected and control cattle groups (P > 0.05), consistent with the microarray results.
Off-test BW and hot carcass weight were numerically heavier for cattle supplemented with P and vitamin D. Supplementing P and/ or vitamin D to finishing calves had no significant benefit on growth performance or carcass characteristics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com