Sentence examples for category training from inspiring English sources

Table 3 Frequencies of codes within the category 'women's strategies' Category Training company Vocational school Total Resilience 12 3 15 Assimilation 1 9 10 Excellence 6 2 8 Avoidance 6 1 7 Total 25 15 40.

This effect of morph level was larger in the category training condition than in the visual exposure condition, as revealed by a condition×morph level interaction [F 4,8) = 6.02, p<.05].

Before training there was no linear relation between morph level and right middle fusiform response in the category training condition [F 1,4) = 0.09, p = n.s.; R = 0.15], birds from the no training condition [F 1,4) = 0.00, p = n.s.; R = 0.29], or for birds from the visual exposure condition [F 1,4) = 0.11, p = n.s.; R = 0.16].

As an example, for the 10%% morph levels of category trained birds (if a subject had bird types A and B assigned to category training) we used responses to the following birds in the calculation: 90A 10B, 90C 10B, 90D:10B, 90E:10B, 90F 10B, 90B 10A, 90C 10A, 90D:10A, 90E:10A, 90F 10A.

Table 6 Classification results under the traditional credit risk assessment index system Model category Training sample set Test sample set Accuracy Type I error rate Type II error rate Accuracy Type I error rate Type II error rate BP neural network 66.67 %100%0% 0 % 55.56 % 100%0%0 % SVM model 76.67 % 26.67 % 21.67 % 63.49 % 46.43 % 28.57 %.

Table 5 Comparison of experimental results of the SVM model and the BP neural network model Model category Training sample set Test sample set Accuracy Type I error rate Type II error rate Accuracy Type I error rate Type II error rate BP neural network 66.67 %100%0% 0 % 55.56 % 100%0%0 % SVM model 91.11 % 13.33 % 6.67 % 93.65 %3.57%8.57%57 %3.57%8.57%

As can be seen in Figure 6, a clear linear relationship of morph level and brain response was obtained in the post-training scan session for the category trained birds in the right fusiform only.

This relation should be present for the category trained birds, post-training but not pre-training, and also not for birds from the visual exposure condition for which category-learning was hindered.

The six bird types were divided into pairs, and each pair was assigned to one of three conditions: 1) category training, where subjects received correct feedback to their responses, 2) visual exposure, where the amount of exposure to the birds was equal to the amount of exposure to the category trained birds, but category learning was hindered by random feedback, 3) no training.

Responses were positively related with the morph-level of category trained birds and negatively related with the morph-level of birds for which category-learning was hindered by random feedback.

Instead, advocates for gays in the service have by and large avoided a discussion of unit cohesion, relying instead on arguments falling into three categories: training costs, civil rights and individual performance.