Spontaneity is conceived of as being intelligible through the "Categories of Judgment".
Motivated by the past evidence that adults rely partially on outcome-based judgment for judgments of deserved punishment, but not for judgments of moral wrongness, we explore the same categories of judgment in young children.
Our minds are able to correlate various categories of judgment, such as color, size, shape, location, etc., and therefore to perceive individual things as composed of unique combinations of various qualities.
The guidance establishes two categories of judgments: those which must normally be published and those which may be published.
Vanity and venality can be hard to tease apart, but both fit well in the category of poor judgment.
For each category of needs, a judgment matrix A nxn was designed, where "n" is the number of needs in this category.
First, it leaves it unclear what category of thing a "moral judgment" is; in particular, is it a mental state or a linguistic entity?
Guyer, for example, argues that Kant has not adequately established the last of these connections, that although Kant claims that the categories are simply the forms of judgment as they are employed in the synthesis of representations in an intuition (A79/B104-A80/B105, B143), he has failed to make this claim plausible (Guyer 1987: 94 102).
The addition of such transcendental content turns the form of judgment into a category.
By connecting synthesis to judgment in this way, and the forms of judgment to the categories, Kant aims to show that we must employ the categories in the synthesis of our experience of objects.
