Sentence examples for category evidence from inspiring English sources

In this IOM category, evidence from available studies is sufficient to conclude that there is a positive association.

Although there were only a few trials included in each category, evidence favours hand washing intervention in preventing diarrhoea in all the settings.

In this IOM category, evidence from available studies is consistent in not showing a positive association between exposure to a specific agent and a specific health outcome after exposure of any magnitude.

Since there is adequate evidence to support irritable mania as a phenomenological category, evidence from family history, response to treatment, clinical course and stability of symptoms across different episodes must be sought to support the existence of a clinical subtype.

In this IOM category, evidence from available studies is of insufficient quantity, quality, or consistency to permit a conclusion regarding the existence of an association between exposure to a specific agent and a specific health outcome in humans.

In this IOM category, evidence from available studies suggests an association between exposure to a specific agent and a specific health outcome in human studies, but the body of evidence is limited by the inability to rule out chance and bias, including confounding, with confidence.

Similarly, for most antecedent categories, evidence from early childhood and early adolescence was sparse, particularly for language and motor functioning.

These guidelines were classified in three categories: evidence based, consensus based and consensus based with no explicit consideration of evidence (CB-EB).

Errors were divided in the following four categories: evidence keywords not picked up by the algorithm, evidence keyword picked up by the algorithm but removed from the patient entry by the negation/speculation filter, different spelling variations of the evidence keywords in the learned model and in the evidence entry, and patient wrongly labeled as a positive case by the annotator.

Four statements were developed for application in primary care, three supported by category A evidence and one by category C evidence (see Table 1).

She couples this with arguments for the historically dynamic nature of the category of evidence; changes in public and communal standards of evidence will result in changes to the evidence itself.