Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(26)
Based on this analysis, we feel that we have reliably categorized subjects into the correct amputation group based on, in many cases, radiology reports alone.
We categorized subjects based on nap frequency during the prior week (0 nap, 1 to 2 naps, and 3 to 4 naps) and found differences in Stage 1, Stage 2, and SWS between groups.
We categorized subjects using the spirometric classification of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) [18].
With the aid of agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis, we categorized subjects into major clusters, which were found to have significantly different distributions of β2-AR Arg16Gly genotype.
We categorized subjects with any stimulant use in the 30 days prior as stimulant users.
A cut point of five or higher categorized subjects as having elevated depressive symptoms (13).
Similar(34)
CBCT-synthesized lateral cephalograms were used to categorize subjects into three groups based on their vertical skeletal pattern.
We used a fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dl to categorize subjects as probably diabetic.
We used CD4 cell count to categorize subjects with regard to the degree of immunosuppression.
Once calculated the wealth index was used to categorize subjects into tertiles.
We reanalyzed these relationships, categorizing subjects based on change in health status as measured by the RSS-4, SF-12 PCS, CES-D, and PCRQ.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com