Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(7)
Table 5 presents a summary of the categorized studies chronologically over the last 10 years.
We categorized studies by intervention type and adequacy of research design using commonly accepted criteria.
CLN conducted the literature searches, selected and categorized studies, extracted and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
We also categorized studies as having a relative risk reduction as follows: 1) <50% and 2)>50%.
We categorized studies according to the total number of study participants (true cases + non-cases) in small (< 250) and large (≥ 250) studies.
For subsequent analyses, we categorized studies as having a relatively lower risk of bias if the Jadad score was >3 and there was adequate concealment of allocation.
Similar(53)
We also categorized study participants into insulin users versus oral diabetes medication users according to ATC code.
A mean value of 4.86 was used to categorized study participants into two categories (poor treatment seeking behavior or good treatment seeking behavior).
We collapsed responses and categorized study participants into categories of no consumption of fatty fish, <1 serving/week, 1 serving/week, 2 servings/week, ≥3 servings/week for both reported frequency and energy-adjusted frequency.
In our study, we used the final report to categorize studies as normal or abnormal.
We categorize studies according their approaches to measuring effectiveness, draw conclusions regarding the current state of technology transfer evaluation, and offer recommendations for future studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com