Sentence examples for categorized respectively from inspiring English sources

A total of 16 and 30 cell lines were categorized respectively as sensitive and resistant to selenium in the NCI60 cell line panel (Figure 1, Table 1).

The test result was categorized respectively as high, moderate, low or no increase in concentration of fibrinogen and/or immunoglobulin based on GT-time (Table 2).

Yearly household income was categorized, respectively, as low (<61.654 EUR), medium (61.654 80.381 EUR) or high (>80.381 EUR) income, grouped by 33.3rd and 66.6th percentiles [ 44].

Based on sequence homology, the following significant DEGs annotated by the GO database were identified: (a) in ZNN-vs-ZNH and ZHN-vs-ZHH, 50 and 51 functional groups were categorized, respectively; (b) in ZNN-vs-ZHN and ZNH-vs-ZHH, 55 and 44 functional groups were categorized, respectively.

Additive, dominant and recessive models were calculated using linear and logistic regression models for the quantitative and categorized traits respectively.

This variable is categorized as, respectively, a large decrease in LTPA of at least two shifts downwards; sustained level of LTPA by switching to the neighbouring category or no change; and a great increase in level of LTPA by at least two shifts upwards.

Participants were categorized as, respectively, "underweight" (BMI <17 kg/m for both girls and boys), "normal weight" (17 to 23.29 kg/m for boys and17 to 23.94 kg/m for girls) or "overweight" (BMI >23.29 kg/m for boys and BMI >23.94 kg/m for girls), using thresholds for 15 year old girls and boys [ 43].

Contigs that were matched only by the parasite or host sets were categorized as such respectively.

Figures 1 and 2 show the unadjusted rates of unintentional opioid related overdose deaths and acute acre utilizations, respectively, categorized by no, low and high implementation.

We also calculated P values for testing the null hypothesis of no exposure outcome association, referred to as Ptrend (one degree of freedom) and Pglobal (three degrees of freedom) for the continuous and categorized exposure models, respectively.

In total, 52.5 % (n = 1795) and 8.3 % (n = 283) of the whole study population (n = 3546) were categorized as NWL and NWO, respectively, after excluding the subjects who did not meet the inclusion criteria.