Exact(1)
The nsubj and nsubjpass are categorized as subject according to Stanford Typed Dependency Manual (Marneffe & Manning, 2008).
Similar(59)
Patients were categorized as subjects who discontinued (37 [16%]) or subjects who completed (198 [84%]) with lurasidone in the ITT population based on discontinuation due to any cause at the six-week endpoint.
Of note, 230 and 1126 CpG segments categorized as subjects and escapes were assigned to the nearest TSSs of genes, and were further narrowed down into 212 and 993 unique TSSs, respectively.
Individuals who were already being treated for diabetes with insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents, or a physician-prescribed diet were categorized as known diabetic subjects, irrespective of their glucose levels.
Of those remaining 3,901 subjects, in an attempt to exclude those who had not been diagnosed as having knee OA, but had the possibility of having knee OA, this study excluded 797 subjects who replied 'yes' or who did not reply to the question of "Have you had knee pain for the past month or longer?" The remaining 3104 subjects were categorized as control subjects.
In addition, 2.8% (N = 14) were categorized as "doubtful case subjects" and 13.6% (N = 68) as "noncase subjects".
Firstly, the sample was categorized as healthy subjects, out-patients and in-patients groups.
Prior to World War II, women were categorized as "protected subjects" in clinical investigations, particularly drug trials, out of fear of unforeseen teratogenic harm to the fetus among pregnant women.
Although this is not surprising given that anonymized specimens are not currently categorized as human subjects research according to U.S. regulations, most ADs (61%) in this study reported that an initial review by their IRBs would be necessary even when specimens are anonymized.
Children who were described as both African American and white were categorized as mixed-race subjects.
Moderate hypoglycaemia was categorized as episodes where subjects required assistance, but responded to oral treatment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com