Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Regarding relevance, ring test results show that the total percentage of studies categorized as "relevant without/with restrictions" did not differ between the CRED and Klimisch evaluation methods.
However, more studies were categorized as "relevant without restrictions" when the CRED evaluation method (57 %) than when the Klimisch method (32%%) was used.
Both the CRED and Klimisch evaluation methods resulted in a high percentage of studies categorized as "relevant without restrictions" (C1) and "relevant with restrictions" (C2) (Fig. 2a; Additional file 1: part D Table D2).
For one of the eight studies (study H), results of the relevance evaluations differed significantly between the Klimisch and CRED evaluation methods (Fig. 2b; Additional file 1: part D Table D2) with a higher percentage of studies categorized as "relevant without restrictions" when using the CRED evaluation method.
Full-text was then obtained, reviewed by two reviewers, and independently categorized as "relevant" or "not relevant".
In goal-directed top-down attention paradigms, expected perceptive contents are categorized as relevant or irrelevant information within a tenth of second (Thorpe et al., 1996; Rousselet et al., 2007; for review see Klimesch, 2011).
Similar(53)
The traumas would be categorized as moderate.
All adverse events were categorized as mild.
Each candidate term was read and then categorized as being relevant or not relevant for immunity or cancer based on the expert knowledge of an immunologist or cancer researcher, respectively.
Differences occured when deciding whether a study is to be categorized as either "relevant without restrictions" or "relevant with restrictions".
The domains, categorized as enzymatically relevant, appeared to be non-essential for field sculpturing at long distances.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com