Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Responses were categorized as correct or incorrect.
Reported results were compared with the reference results, and categorized as correct or incorrect.
The answers about mode of action were categorized as correct vs. incorrect by consensus rating.
If the highest score/self-alignment score-ratio was above 0.6, the gene was categorized as correct.
Similar(56)
37% had 2 or fewer errors that were categorized as "partially correct" or "blank", primarily in the field to identify that the facility had closed (see Table 3).
An additional 28% were able to provide all of the essential facts with two or fewer individual responses categorized as "partially correct" or "blank"- these were most commonly the specific numbers of perpetrators or number of victims.
2) each participant would receive a final score of "acceptable" if all essential facts were reported correctly or there were 2 or fewer errors categorized as either "partially correct" or "blank".
Responses were categorized as "Good Knowledge" (10 correct answers), "Average Knowledge" (7 9 correct answers) and "Poor Knowledge" (less than 6 correct answers).
A count of correct responses was taken for each of the five questions and categorized as follows: 0 = No correct responses, 1 = One correct response and 2 = Two or more correct responses.
Raters in the study were asked to rate an essay that was labeled as "correct" and another that was categorized as the "wrong" essay.
One hundred and thirty-seven patients (29.3%) with 6 to 9 correct answers were categorized as marginal health literacy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com