Many subjects of the control group still categorized the problems based on the similarity of their superficial features, while many subjects of the experimental group came to categorize the problems based on the similarity of their structural features, that is, the dominant principles/laws of problems (e.g., Newton's second law, balance of forces, conservation of energy).
We first analyze these problems in this paper and categorized the problems into four aspects.
Most of the subjects categorized the problems based on the similarity of their superficial features, such as the components of the system (e.g., inclined plane, springs) and the figures of motion (e.g., circular motion, free fall).
Design methods and the related research are based on studying, characterizing, and categorizing the characteristics of exceptional engineering designs, the resulting industrial products or processes, and the ways in which designers categorize the design problems to arrive at innovations.
Thus, the objective of this article is to evaluate the models and methods that have been used in developing DSS for forest management, taking into account all important features to categorize the forest problems.
Nguyen-Thinh and Kojiri (2010) categorize the task of problem generation as the following two types.
Each of those representation schemes has its own particularities, and the variety of forms each can take makes it necessary to categorize the type of problems requiring an ES, so that the most appropriate knowledge representation form(s) (KRF) is used.
Given a piece of written text, the problem is to categorize the text into one specific sentiment polarity, positive or negative (or neutral).
Two of the evaluators were also asked to categorize the questions more generally as problem solving/critical thinking or factual recall (Table 2).
