Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Twenty Swiss albino mice (25 30 g) fasted overnight were randomly selected and categorized into four groups of five animals each denoted as negative control group (Group I), positive control group (Group II) and test groups (Group III & IV).
Mice with an average tumor volume of 45 mm after four weeks were categorized into two groups of seven.
Participants were first classified into physiological (n = 549) versus non-physiological (n = 170) cocaine dependence groups for one set of analyses and then categorized into one of four groups for further analyses: (1) tolerance only (n = 215), (2) tolerance plus withdrawal (n = 279), (3) withdrawal only (n = 55) or (4) no physiological dependence (n = 170).
Vegetation can be categorized into one of four groups: grass-like plants (monocots); broad-leaf herbaceous plants ("weeds"); woody shrub-like plants ("brush"); and, trees.
Patients were categorized into one of four groups according to their neck angle: I (0 10°); II (11 39°); III (40 59°); or IV (60 85°).
Young adults (n = 153) were categorized into one of four groups: monolingual musician; bilingual musician; bilingual non-musician; and monolingual non-musician.
The reasons for rejection were categorized into one of four groups.
For simplicity, the cell lines were categorized into one of four groups and are designated as either ASS1-high, medium, low or negative (Table 1).
Because there were no differences in observed results when ethnicity was categorized into five groups instead of two groups, we reclassified ethnicity as European or non-European.
The overall lack of agreement between reviewers and authors persisted even after performing a second inter-rater reliability test when categorizing into three groups of risk of bias.
Children with suspected or diagnosed infections were categorized into three groups of severity of infection: (i) infected without SIRS (n = 36), (ii) sepsis (n = 91) and, (iii) severe sepsis (n = 13).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com