Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase 'categorize being' is not correct or usable in written English
It is grammatically incorrect. If you are looking for a way to talk about classifying people or things into groups, you could use a phrase like 'categorize objects' or 'categorize creatures.' For example, "The zoologist was able to accurately categorize creatures based on their physical characteristics."
Exact(1)
Those psychiatrists had to categorize being gay and trans as mental illnesses in order to shut down the argument; it is so obvious to everyone else, including those conservative extremists who fear trans rights functioning as a shield for male sexual predators.
Similar(59)
Kids' ability to sort, to categorize, is not listened to.
With respect to signal type, targeted and easy to categorize were two useful elements to consider.
I realize the need to name and categorize is an ancient human condition.
In addition, articles were categorized being qualitative, quantitative or neither.
Categorizing is useful.
One of the earliest methods by which poems were categorized was that of rhyming syllable.
How so much information gets tidily categorized is a mystery.
Answers that could not be categorized were marked as miscellaneous.
Some of the difficult-to-categorize are listed below: Erhu (Chinese two-stringed fiddle).
Disorders are routinely categorized as being hereditary, dictated by genes, or environmental, due to ambient toxins or microbes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com