Sentence examples for categorization training from inspiring English sources

There was a distributed pattern of training-induced changes associated only with categorization training, with increased activity in the medial regions and decreased activity towards the lateral regions (Fig. 4).

In contrast to phonemic categorization training, which engaged primarily the left mSTS, learning to categorize the nonphonemic sounds engaged the left pSTS with little change in left mSTS.

Recently, fMRI data provided evidence for increased neural sensitivity in occipitotemporal cortex after categorization training [16].

The stark contrast in both behavioral and neural measures following individuation versus categorization training offers additional support for the process-map hypothesis [35], [36].

Recently, it has been shown that neuronal selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex is shaped by those object features that were most relevant during categorization training [10].

In contrast, the higher the percentage of features trained to be irrelevant for categorization training, the smaller the right fusiform responses.

No significant training effect was found in the categorization-training group for either task [ts<1].

The correlations remained high with separate analyses for the categorization-training [within: r = .82, P = .006; between: r = .49, P = .185] and individuation-training groups [within: r = .50, P = .167; between: r = .60, P = .084].

Nine were in the individuation-training group (six females, seven right-handed, age M = 22.11, SD = 1.32) and nine in the categorization-training group (five females, six right-handed, age M = 21.22, SD = 1.22).

Participants in the categorization-training group learned to recognize the Ziggerins by naming at the class level and by rapidly categorizing Ziggerins in an array of other Ziggerins of the same style.

Further analyses showed that the training effects were different across the medial and lateral regions only for the categorization-training group [within: F7,56 = 3.55, P = .003; between: F7,56 = 4.75, P<.001] but not for the individuation-training group [within: F7,56<1; between: F7,56 = 1.18, P = .323].