Sentence examples for categorization of subjects from inspiring English sources

The categorization of subjects as normotensive or hypertensive, using the wrist device in subjects without specific training, achieved a correct classification of 84% (with position sensor) and 81% (without position sensor) in comparison to ABPM.

The advantage with the hybrid approach is that the categorization of subjects with respect to the outcome variables can be avoided.

Evaluation of categorization of subjects by normal (≤ULN) or high (>ULN) enzyme status showed a change in status from screening to baseline for many subjects.

Following categorization of subjects, we compared the demographic data and the personality traits at the start of the CBT program among groups, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and chi-squared test of independence for categorical variables.

In comparison to other observational studies enrolling subjects from a general population, the novelty in this study is related to (1) selection of a chest pain population with suspected ACS, (2) blood samples obtained at hospital admission, and (3) categorization of subjects with and without myocardial injury.

Three or more of the following criteria were required for categorization of subjects with MetS: waist circumference > 102 cm for men and > 88 cm for women; blood pressure ≥ 130⁄85 mmHg or use of anti-hypertensive drugs; fasting plasma triglycerides ≥ 1.70 mmol/l; HDL cholesterol < 1.0 mmol/l for men and < 1.3 mmol/l for women; fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/l.

Detection of both parvovirus B19 and PARV4 sequences was highly reproducible between the 2 tissues analyzed (Table 2), which enabled generally unambiguous categorization of study subjects into infected and uninfected categories.

In order to assess the sensitivity of our findings, we repeated the base case analysis after categorization of the study subjects using the selected alternative LLN prediction equations [ 6, 26- 29].

Possible explanations for these discrepancies in bacterial diversity between previous studies and ours include the small number of study samples and differences in BMI categorization of the study subjects.

For this reason, we compare the categorization of the subjects made by means of the results of both models.

Her interest was piqued by Simon LeVay's 1991 Science paper [ 7] because it employed a very simple categorization of its subjects into "men, women and gay men".