Sentence examples for categorization of study from inspiring English sources

The focus of this discussion involves the hypoallergenic categorization of study dogs.

Further research into this area as well as standardization of research techniques (such as sample collection techniques and methods used for categorization of study participants) is required.

Categorization of study participants according to symptom levels of stress, depression and anxiety were made using cut off points suggested in the literature [ 29].

Detection of both parvovirus B19 and PARV4 sequences was highly reproducible between the 2 tissues analyzed (Table 2), which enabled generally unambiguous categorization of study subjects into infected and uninfected categories.

The categorization of study participants into normo- or microalbuminuric at the baseline assessment was also associated with increased risk of hypertension in both men (almost fourfold increased risk) and women (twofold increased risk).

This may also be due to the more detailed guidance for relevance assessment in the CRED evaluation method [19], thus providing higher certainty for the categorization of studies.

However, the influence of critical criteria on categorization of studies is expected to be small, as participants rejected their application and felt strongly that expert judgement was needed to decide which criteria were critical based on study design.

Final categorization of studies was based on reading of the full papers by two authors (OV and HM) in groups (A), (B) and (C), identified studies were included or re-classified as appropriate.

We did not consider the Clinical Trials Ontology (OCR) [ 20] as basis for our information model; because the focus of this ontology is not on research processes but on study design (containing descriptors of study design and a categorization of studies by their design descriptors) and research analysis.

Alternate statistical methods have been developed for such circumstances, but some of these methods have come under recent scrutiny (see Hadfield et al. 2010; Kinnison et al. 2011; Uusi-Heikkila et al. 2011), making a strict categorization of studies somewhat subjective in practice.

Different categorizations of study groups and reasons for seeking TCM in these studies limit the comparability of these findings to the results of this study.