Sentence examples for categorization discrimination from inspiring English sources

First, these tasks can be grouped in explicit (categorization, discrimination, single interval tapping, and multiple interval tapping) and implicit (circle drawing) timing tasks.

In addition, we included three motor (single and multiple interval tapping, and circle drawing), and two perceptual (categorization, discrimination) paradigms that, in fact, can also be subdivided into single (categorization, single interval tapping) or multiple interval (discrimination, multiple interval tapping, and circle drawing) tasks.

In fact, both the hierarchical clustering and MDS analyses validated the distinction between explicit and implicit timing, with a clear separation of the temporal variability of the circle drawing task from the explicit timing tasks (categorization, discrimination, single and multiple interval tapping).

It encompasses tests of speech categorization, discrimination, articulation and repetition of simple and short (two-syllable) pseudo-words.

Twenty human subjects executed the following explicit timing tasks: interval categorization and discrimination (perceptual tasks), and single and multiple interval tapping (production tasks).

In addition, only the dendrogram for the tasks in the visual modality (Fig 3B, bottom) showed the clustering between perception (categorization and discrimination) and production (single and multiple interval tapping) tasks.

They then practiced the categorization and discrimination task.

Participants performed categorization and discrimination tasks before the stimulation (pre), immediately after the stimulation (post 1) and 30 min after post 1 (post 2) (Fig. 1).

English performance was analogous to that of the Japanese listeners in So and Best (2010), but their results provide more specific insight into the categorization and discrimination relationship; English listeners (So & Best, 2014) showed large discrepancies among the UC pairs, with one UC pair being associated with much better discrimination than the TC pairs.

Data from one participant were excluded from the analyses of both categorization and discrimination tasks because the slope of category boundary in the pre-TMS condition differed by >2 standard deviations from the mean and it was impossible to define between-category pairs.

Although Experiments 2A and 2B appear to show a dichotomy between categorization and geometrical discrimination, Barton, Keenan, and Bass (2001) found that the effect of inversion on the discrimination of spatial relations decreases with increased viewing time.