Sentence examples for categorised the study from inspiring English sources

Herders categorised the study area into two macro landscapes, namely, Badhaa and Gamoji, which had contrasting microclimates.

The authors categorised the study as a 'pilot', to evaluate a possible positive effect of statin treatment on amnesia and disorientation after head injury.

We categorised the study topics according to the main interventions covered: breastfeeding assistance and promotion, preventing and treating post-natal depression, interventions to support and build capacity around parenting and child care, antenatal interventions preparing women for birth, postnatal planning of future births and control trials around changing maternal behaviours.

It should be noted that although we have categorised the studies into three distinct categories of spatial epidemiological approaches, this was to simplify the presentation of these results and understanding by a non-technical audience.

We categorised the studies as being in primary or secondary prevention, depending on whether the study included participants with manifest cardiovascular disease prior to randomisation.

We categorised the studies according to inclusion diagnosis and whether acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) was present or not.

Most of the included trial publications contained a statement delineating the funding sources; in cases where sponsorship information was not clearly documented, we checked the author affiliations and categorised the studies with industry affiliated authors as industry sponsored.

We used systematic and transparent approaches to extract data, categorise the studies according to prespecified models and to analyse and compare the data.

Furthermore, we have used systematic and transparent approaches to extract data from the validation studies, categorise the studies according to three different models and to analyse and compare the data.

However, reviewers attempted to categorise the studies in a meaningful and logical model, but were unable to recognise any consistent evidence to support the effectiveness of community-based interventions to enhance PA level.

To compare the characteristics, 60 pre-existing glaucoma cases were categorised as the study group, and 261 non-glaucoma cases were categorised as the control group.