Sentence examples for categorised papers from inspiring English sources

Finally, we categorised papers as either: a 'key paper' (KP) that is 'conceptually rich and could potentially make an important contribution to the synthesis'; a satisfactory paper (SAT); fatally flawed (FF); irrelevant to the synthesis [ 3].

Finally, we categorised papers as either: a 'key paper'conceptuallylly rich and could potentially make an important contribution to the synthesis'); a satisfactory paper; a paper that is irrelevant to the synthesis; a methodologically fatally flawed paper [ 22].

We categorise papers using the defined dimensions of purpose, application area, method, scope and sponsor (originator).

There are differences in the spectra of new and aged materials from different sources, which provide the basis of a "fingerprint" method to categorise papers into different "families".

The 1988 Swedish study [7] was one of the most thorough early studies, and used sixfolds as the criterion to categorise paper into the most degraded, with "many tears and/or pieces missing, worn edges, slight to strong yellowing, breaking corner on sixfolds".

In our citation analysis, we categorised four papers as historical.

Whilst there are doubtless many alternative ways of categorising the papers by theme, and any such categorisation overlooks areas of overlap and linkage, we will summarise the papers in three broad groupings: the practices of assuring quality in healthcare; giving 'space to the story'; and addressing moral complexity in the clinic, the classroom and the academy.

An overview framework is constructed to categorise the papers, and to illustrate key actors and factors for sustainable production and consumption.

These theoretical underpinnings will serve as a rationale or framework for categorising the papers.

An assessment of the theoretical frameworks underpinning the guidance was made and served as a rationale for categorising the papers.

Furthermore it was decided that papers receiving the highest possible rating (2 for each criteria) would be categorised as key papers (Table 1).