Sentence examples similar to categorisation 1 from inspiring English sources

Malformations were coded according to the Eurocat categorisation, 21 and congenital heart defects were further categorised in developmentally based subgroups as suggested by Louik et al. 13 As information on malformations in stillborn children is incompletely registered we included only liveborn children in the analyses.

This simplicity, robustness, flexibility, and reasonably high accuracies have been exploited in diverse fields such as patent research [10], medical research [11], astrophysics [12], bioinformatics [13], and text categorisation [14, 15].

The initial feedforward stream of up to 100 150 ms is thus sufficient for coarse object categorisation [11], [12].

Face memory has been shown to be reduced by social outgroup categorisation [32] and, in the race field, it has been shown that strength of holistic processing can be altered merely by changing the perceived race group of an ambiguous-race face stimulus (an Asian-Caucasian morph; [33]).

Most of the studies included in this subgroup analysis (4 out of 7) used this categorisation (1-9 cig/dandand ≥10 cig/day), thus the same was applied in the subgroup analysis.

Geographical categorisation 58 approached conventional levels of statistical significance as a predictor (p=0.07).

For categorisation, 0 4% hypomethylation was considered unchanged (0), 5 12% as moderate (1) and >12% as strong (2), slightly modified from a previous report (Schulz et al, 2002).

Discussion between EP and AK resolved uncertainty in regard of the rating for 30 of 485 forms due to poor legibility (14 forms) and doubts about categorisation (16 forms).

Admittedly, the population is split this time between fewer clusters (10 instead of 12), but examining the box-plot of the posterior distribution for the log odds ratio displayed in Additional file 1: Figure S5 we can see immediately that the range of the new values of the log OR (0.72 to 4.41) is similar to that obtained with the previous finer categorisation (0.87 to 4.60).

There was no clear effect driving this interaction, though the closest to reaching significance was an interaction between Exposure and electrode[L-R] in the Categorisation groups (F1.37, 38.33 = 3.44, p = .06), which had not been present in the Recognition groups.

Based on the cross-layer and layered categorisation, Tables 1 and 2 provided in Section 4 summarize the different proposals in more detail for quick overview.