Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(40)
Six categories were assessed and compared.
Five functional categories were assessed using 13 soil parameters focused on ecological sustainability.
As all measured amplitude and latency values were distributed normally (D'Agostino-Pearson normality test), differences in latency and amplitude between the nine ISI categories were assessed using a repeated-measure one-way ANOVA.
Red and green images were then combined, and the percentages of neurons within the following categories were assessed: EGFP-negative / DARPP-32-positive; EGFP-positive / DARPP-32-positive; low-EGFP / DARPP-32-positive; high-EGFP / DARPP-32-positive neurons.
Categories were assessed with the chi-square test for independence.
Classification of HPV types into high and low-risk categories were assessed according to previous descriptions.
Similar(20)
Significance of differences within categories was assessed using Chi squared tests.
As users transition to a new email platform, it is imperative that you do not get lost amongst competitors as new Inbox categories are assessed and built out.
Significance of over-representation of functional categories was assessed via Fisher's exact test and corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.
Then, enrichment for GO and KEGG categories was assessed using the "GOstats" R package [ 52].
The difference between F-ECOHIS scores among the three categories was assessed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com