Similar(60)
Questionnaires could be broadly categorised as follows, although there was some overlap between categories: satisfaction with/orientation of life [ 19- 22]; coping with/adjustment to illness [ 23- 27]; quality of life [ 28- 34], Self-efficacy [ 21, 35- 39]; self-concept [ 15, 22]; spiritual wellbeing [ 18, 40, 41].
The survey consisted of 24 items and two categories: (i) satisfaction with care (14 items) and (ii) satisfaction with decision making (10 items).
Since we aimed to identify factors which influenced whether to undergo the procedure or not, we identified 'a priori' explanatory variables based on previous research [ 18, 17, 15] in five categories; (1) satisfaction with conventional healthcare, (2) mental health, (3) MS severity, (4) resources (personal and financial), and (5) lifestyle/overall health (Table 1).
Receipt or assessment of social support was the most commonly assessed outcome (16 studies) in this category and included satisfaction with social support and the size and extent of the social network.
The first main category "Comfortable with information" covered three categories: "Trust and confidence", "Satisfaction with information" and "Taking control".
The reasons for not using the new information to provide additional instruction included the following three categories: shortage of time, satisfaction with students' performance, and having no clear clue how to use the information.
Information was gathered about job satisfaction (with categories '(very) satisfied' and '(very) unsatisfied').
There were some missing data (i.e. no response to items in the self-administered questionnaire by the 210 HV): 7 on gender, 8 on age, 10 on socio-professional category, 4 on overall satisfaction with the welcome process and 10 on satisfaction with protocol management.
The MJS questionnaire used was divided into 7 categories, which were personal satisfaction, satisfaction with workload, satisfaction with professional support, satisfaction with training, satisfaction with pay, satisfaction with prospects and satisfaction with standards of care.
A change of one category (on the 0 6 categories scale) of meeting expectations or satisfaction with pain relief resulted in being 2 3 times more likely to be satisfied with the outcome.
Finally, all authoring tools were perceived positively in terms of user satisfaction with sub-categories of learning, controlling, design, satisfaction and productivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com