EPS events were categorized on an ordered categorical scale based on the intensity of EPS-related AEs.
We show how to interpret sampled measurement results when they belong to a categorical scale.
Finally, we extend this paradigm to allow for jointly adaptive selection of spatial and categorical scale.
Survival was measured according to a categorical scale (i.e. 1 = alive, 0 = dead).
Task-difficulty was measured in a categorical scale: low, medium and high.
As a form of measurement, a 9-point categorical scale was used for thermal sensation and a 7-point categorical scale for sweat sensation, thermal comfort, and thirst sensation.
Although the categorical scale is a good approximation of resolution time, there are certainly more precise alternatives.
Our interest in this paper is on the choice of spatial and categorical scale, and their interaction, in creating classifications of land cover from remotely sensed measurements.
In this paper, non-parametric models based on the categorical scale are discussed and proposed for the method in different designs.
We note that in discussing categorical scale, the concept of spatial scale naturally arises, and in discussing spatial scale, the issue of aggregation of measurements must be considered.
Resolution time was also binned in a categorical scale: low (0-20 mediums), mediuminutes0 minutes) and high (more than 60 minutes).
