Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

categorical result

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "categorical result" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a definitive or absolute outcome is being described, often in scientific or analytical discussions. Example: "The experiment yielded a categorical result, confirming the hypothesis without any ambiguity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

An interpretation of the differences between the continuous model plots and the categorical result plots represents the effect of the confounders.

We will use the general linear models of the SPSS 15 statistical package, to analyse the effect of the treatment on the categorical result variables (tobacco cessation rate).

Such differences in outcome measures (e.g., continuous versus categorical) result in different assumptions and analytical approaches being used (see for a Discussion [ 36]).

Categorical result interpretations are based on the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (http://clsi.org/) criteria adopted by the reporting facilities at the time of testing and reflect susceptibilities as reported to clinicians.

Most relevant to the current article is that the gravity model itself offers a categorical result, which may be considered limiting, and other methods of determining access abound [ 34].

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Although the result of the Ames test can be reported as a standardized quantity of the number of colonies formed, in most recent studies and databases, including the Novartis internal test results, are reported as categorical results: "Ames-positive" (Ames+) or "Ames-negative" (Ames-).

We conducted categorical meta-analyses by pooling the categorical results reported in the studies.

There was no difference in the results; therefore, categorical results are presented.

+P values between categorical results were generated using the Wilcoxon two sample test.

In addition, the two categorical results of a selected gene were comparatively analysed.

This test produces categorical results ranging from zero (<1 10 ng/mL cotinine equivalents) to six (>2000 ng/mL).

Science

BMC Cancer
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "categorical result", ensure that the context clearly indicates that the outcome falls into distinct, non-overlapping categories. Avoid using it when the results are continuous or can be interpreted on a spectrum.

Common error

Avoid forcing continuous data into a "categorical result" framework. This can lead to a loss of valuable information and potentially skew the analysis. Instead, consider using appropriate statistical methods for continuous variables.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "categorical result" functions as a noun phrase, where 'categorical' modifies 'result'. It describes a specific type of outcome where data is classified into distinct categories. As Ludwig AI underlines, it's used in contexts where a definitive outcome is described, often in scientific or analytical discussions.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "categorical result" refers to an outcome classified into distinct, non-overlapping categories, predominantly found in scientific and analytical contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While its frequency is rare, its use indicates a need for clarity in reporting findings that aren't continuous. When using "categorical result", ensuring mutual exclusivity of categories and considering appropriate statistical methods is essential. For alternative expressions, consider "definitive outcome" or "clear-cut outcome" based on the specific nuance required. The phrase's scientific register reflects its usage in academic and research circles.

FAQs

How is a "categorical result" different from a continuous result?

A "categorical result" classifies data into distinct groups (e.g., positive/negative), while a continuous result measures data on a spectrum (e.g., temperature, height). The type of result dictates the appropriate analytical methods.

When is it appropriate to use "categorical result" in a scientific paper?

Use "categorical result" when describing outcomes that fall into predefined categories, especially in fields like medicine (disease diagnosis) or surveys (opinion polls). Ensure that the categories are mutually exclusive and well-defined.

What are some statistical methods for analyzing "categorical result" data?

Common methods include chi-squared tests, logistic regression, and Fisher's exact test. The choice depends on the research question and the number of categories involved. Be sure to validate your approach with your institution standards.

Are there alternatives to the phrase "categorical result" that I can use?

Yes, depending on the context, you could use phrases like "definitive outcome", "absolute finding", or "clear-cut outcome". Consider the specific nuance you wish to convey.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: